The Department of Energy announced $338 million in geothermal energy grants today, and Colorado companies, schools or agencies will get $18 million of that money. The Denver Business Journal’s Cathy Proctor has a list of who will benefit.
Colo. gets $18M in geothermal grants
30 10 2009Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: geothermal energy
Categories : Uncategorized
Two Colo. cities to get smart grid money
28 10 2009As part of the Obama Administration’s $3.4 billion smart grid plan, Pueblo ($6.1 million) and Fort Collins ($18.1 million) will receive money for meters in around 120,000 homes.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Fort Collins smart grid, Pueblo smart grid, smart grid
Categories : Uncategorized
Vestas hiring to increase more slowly
28 10 2009Not a big surprise: Vestas said that a weak third quarter for wind projects means it will ramp up to its expected Colorado employment level of 2,500 slower than originally thought. From Mark Jaffe at the Denver Post:
“At the moment, the U.S. market is characterized by excess capacity, which results in non-attractive prices and conditions on certain projects,” Vestas said in its earnings report.
“The upgrading of the staff at the new factories in the USA will consequently take place in line with the order intake,” the company said.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Colorado green jobs, Colorado renewable energy jobs, Vestas
Categories : Uncategorized
Xcel wants to cut solar rebate…
28 10 2009…of its Solar*Rewards program by 50 cents in the next several weeks. Also, in the next decade Xcel plans to add about 700 megawatts of new wind power, about 350 megawatts from large solar plants, and more than 250 megawatts from resident and commercial solar units.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Xcel Energy, Solar*Rewards
Categories : Uncategorized
It’s climate bill week in Congress
28 10 2009On the national level, there are a couple of good stories today in the Washington Post, as much of the Senate focuses this week on the climate bill. First, columnist Dana Milbank profiles Oklahoma Senator and climate change denier Jim Inhofe, or “the last flat-earther,” as Milbank calls him. It’s a long week for Inhofe, being forced to listen to this mumbo-jumbo “science.”
Also, Steven Mufson takes a look at the incentives on the table for nuclear power.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Dana Milbank, Jim Inhofe, nuclear power
Categories : Uncategorized
German solar firm to move to Denver
27 10 2009SMA Solar Technology AG, a German firm with 40 percent of the global market in DC-to-AC inverters for solar systems, announced this week it would build a manufacturing plant in the Stapleton area of Denver. The company plans to start production next year and employ around 300 people in the state.
Comments : 2 Comments »
Tags: renewable energy jobs, SMA Solar Technology AG
Categories : Uncategorized
Entegrity Wind Systems declares bankruptcy
27 10 2009More from the Boulder Daily Camera here.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Entegrity Wind Systems
Categories : Uncategorized
Lovins, Brand debate nuclear energy
22 10 2009This is probably worth 12 minutes of your time today. Two very big environmental brains – Amory Lovins from the Rocky Mountain Institute and Whole Earth guru Stewart Brand debating nuclear power. Brand is for nuclear power as a solution to climate change, and Lovins opposes – not so much for the nuclear waste, but because he thinks it’s a slow and expensive way to generate energy.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Amory Lovins, nuclear power, Stewart Brand
Categories : Uncategorized
Detest subsidies? How about hidden costs??
21 10 2009A new study by the National Research Council found that the country’s current energy mix has “hidden costs” of an estimated $120 billion per year, which includes health, environmental security and infrastructural external costs – and this doesn’t even count the costs of climate change or greenhouse gas emissions (estimated from $1 to $100 per ton of CO2 emitted). From the Wall Street Journal:
The $120 billion figure boils down to coal and cars. Transport costs the country $56 billion. Coal-fired electricity costs the country $62 billion per year, largely in health impacts from particulate matter. Natural gas for power generation, in contrast, adds about $740 million a year in hidden costs.
Looked at another way, coal’s hidden pricetag adds up to 3.2 cents per kilowatt hour. Compare that to the 2 cents-per-kilowatt hour that wind power gets from the government—that’s less a subsidy than a partial attempt to level the playing field.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: external costs, subsidies
Categories : Uncategorized
Ritter pushes for transmission
21 10 2009Gov. Bill Ritter said on Tuesday that the state will need $2 billion in new and upgraded energy transmission infrastructure to link the growing array of energy sources with population centers. Ritter also said that meshing agricultural areas with the land use and visual impact of large-scale energy projects (like solar thermal facilities) is an issue that needs to be discussed “and that discussion doesn’t begin with no.”
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Gov. Bill Ritter
Categories : Uncategorized